Our Methodology

We prioritise the Qur’an, authenticated hadith records and transparent scholarly review. We distinguish verified evidence from interpretation, represent recognised disagreement fairly, and mark uncertain references for review rather than inventing citations.

Source hierarchy

Claims are linked to source records containing collection, reference, grading and editorial notes.

Disagreement and uncertainty

Recognised scholarly disagreement is described rather than erased. We do not automatically label disputed practices haram, shirk, bid‘ah or kufr.

Corrections

Readers can report an error from every article. Corrections are documented and updated transparently.